Monday, January 30, 2012

Looking Forward to Retirement


Here are some things I’m looking forward to when I retire:
Not having to drive at least an hour to and from work.
Not having to get up at around 5:45 am to exercise before work.
Not having to get out early to shovel 6 inches of snow before going to work.
Being able to choose how I will spend my day.
Being able to have lunch with my lovely wife.
Having time to read more (serious things and entertaining mysteries).
Having time to use the woodshop tools I’ve been collecting.
Having time to ride my bicycle during the week (for exercise and leisure).
Not having to wear a tie to work.
Being able to dress casually every day.
Being able to wear my slippers for more than a couple hours a day.
Saving money on gas and servicing for my car.
Not having to worry about how bad the traffic will be on Route 80 at the end of the day, when I’m driving back from Paterson.
Being able to sleep in if I haven’t slept well during the night.
Not having to worry about requests for reports, lists, etc., by the end of the day.
Having more time to get repairs done around the house.
Less stress and having my blood pressure be lower than it’s been in the past few years.  Now there’s one I’m really looking forward to.
Giving people the opportunity to say “Boy, Emil looks really good since he retired.”  I don’t know how many times I’ve heard people say that about other retirees.  I’m not sure why that is.  But, I’m looking forward to seeing whether it works for me.  I’ll let you know a year from now.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

The Face of Poverty


January 15 is the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday.  He is honored as an icon of the Civil Rights movement and his speeches and leadership helped guide that movement.  However, his involvement in working for economic justice is not as well remembered.  Before he was assassinated on April 4, 1968, he had begun to focus his efforts on the Poor People’s Campaign.  He recognized the importance of economic justice in the fight for equality between the races but also as a basic human right.
Now, more than 40 years later, there are still too many poor among us.  Take a look at these statistics:
¨ In 2010, the Census Bureau reported 46.2 million Americans living below the poverty line.
¨ In that same year, there were almost 50 million Americans without health insurance. 
¨ In December 2011, 13.1 million Americans were unemployed, with 5.6 million of those being long-term unemployed, meaning they had been unemployed 27 weeks or more.  In addition, there were 8.1 million categorized as involuntary part-time workers (who had their hours cut back to part time or were unable to find full-time jobs). 
¨ According to the USDA, in 2007, 3.3 million households were food insecure for the children living there, meaning that those households lacked consistent access to food for the children in the household.  Of those 3.3 million households, 85% had one or more adults who were working; 70% had one or more adults working full-time.
I remember seeing a video clip of George W. Bush at a campaign rally, where he was praising one of his supporters who was on the stage with him because that person was working three jobs to support her family.  Come on!  No one should have to work three jobs to support their family.
America is the richest country in the world.  And yet, we have many people who do not have adequate food, housing, employment or health care.  There are many people and politicians who would say that those Americans who are living in poverty could lift themselves out of poverty if they wanted to.  But, with a minimum wage that is not a living wage, that’s not easy to do.  The federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour.  A person who works full-time for that wage will earn just $14,500 per year.
When he was president, Ronald Reagan told a story about a Welfare Queen who was able to acquire so much money through the welfare system that she was able to purchase a Cadillac with the money.  The story created a lot of outrage against the welfare system among Americans.  It turned out the story wasn’t true.  However, it helped develop a mindset among many Americans that people on welfare and poor working people don’t deserve the aid that our social safety net programs provide.
It seems to me that one of the reasons we don’t provide adequate help to other Americans in need is that many of us focus on policies and politics instead of people.  I remember reading that, when respondents to a survey were asked whether they favored specific social programs (e.g., welfare, food stamps), a majority were not in favor of them.  However, if they were asked whether they thought we should help others who were in need, a majority were in favoring of helping them.
Today, with so much unemployment and so many home mortgage foreclosures, perhaps each of us knows a relative or friend or neighbor who has fallen on hard times.  Perhaps we know someone who wants to work but can’t find a job; someone who was talked into a mortgage they couldn’t afford and has now lost their home; someone who is homeless because of not being able to find work; someone who is physically or mentally disabled and is unable to work; a vet returning from war who has PTSD and is unable to work.  Perhaps putting a human face on the issue of poverty will make a difference in the way we approach the issue of poverty and the social safety net programs that help those people.

Monday, January 2, 2012

Give Peace a Chance


Every year the Catholic Church celebrates World Day of Peace on January 1 and the Pope delivers an address related to Peace.  Since it’s the beginning of 2012, I’ve been thinking about World Peace, or the lack of it.
Recently I’ve been reading Come to Think of It, a book of commentaries that Daniel Schorr delivered on National Public Radio for many years.  Every year, beginning in 1991, he had a commentary toward the end of December in which he spoke about how Peace on Earth had fared in the year that was coming to an end.  Each year, from his perspective, Peace had not fared very well on this Earth.  In 2002, he finished his commentary this way:  “Sorry about the gloomy note.  Maybe there’ll be a happier assessment of peace on Earth this time next year.  If not, I’m going to beg off doing these wrap-ups.”  He finally gave up in December of 2005, in a commentary that started “This is my last contribution of the year to All Things Considered, and so allow me to say good-bye 2005 and good riddance.”
For 2011, score one for Peace on Earth with the end of the war in Iraq and all US soldiers coming home.  However, we’re still fighting in Afghanistan and the news is telling us about a possible conflict with Iran, which is threatening to block oil shipments if additional sanctions are put in place against it.  Those are only the conflicts the US is involved in.  There are plenty of other armed conflicts we’re not a party to.
Having spent a fair amount of time this holiday season with my cute and delightful grandchildren, I’ve come up with an idea that I think might work.  My suggestion involves planting children, between the ages of newborn and four years, in places where people in power are making decisions about whether to get along with others or stir things up.
Have you been in places where cute little kids are doing their thing?  They attract people’s attention and inevitably bring a smile to their faces.  Whether it’s an eight month old showing a big bright smile, or an eighteen month old talking animatedly with words that only he understands, or a two and a half year old making all the adults with her copy her as she dances around.  I hadn’t been around young children much for a long time.  But, since we’ve had grandchildren, I’ve become much more aware of this phenomenon.  If you don’t spend much time around them, take my word for it – little kids change things.  All they have to do is walk into the room in all their cuteness and people start to smile.  So, if they were just around everywhere, I think people would lighten up.  The adults’ moods would change and they’d make better (more peaceful) decisions.
Two caveats – I think the kids need to be (as I said above) between the ages of newborn and four years and I think they need to be someone else’s kids.  I mention this last thing because little kids are not always being cute; sometimes they’re cranky because they’re not getting their own way.  But, if they’re someone else’s kids, we seem to be able to tolerate that more than with our own.  Actually, as I think about it, it might work best if they are grandchildren of the adults in the room.  We grandparents seem to think that everything our grandkids do is cute.
Anyhow, that’s my suggestion.  It might not work but, hey, I think it’s worth a try!